| 000 | 01322cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65130 | ||
| 008 | 020308n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117064 | ||
| 100 | _aCottam, G. | ||
| 245 | _aAdjudicator's decision held despite errors | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6755) 28 February 2002, 12(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines how recent cases, "Bouygues v Dahl-Jensen" and "C & B Scene Concept Design v Isobars"have questioned the extent of an adjudicator's jurisdiction. Highlights that the parts of adjudicator's decision which are within jurisdiction will ordinarily be enforced, and that he has to decide,as a matter of law, the extent of the matters referred to him. Adds that the existence of a construction contract is a matter for the courts. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD | ||
| 650 | _aJCT STANDARD FORM OF BUILDING CONTRACT 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aC & B SCENE CONCEPT DESIGN LTD V ISOBARS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aSHERWOOD AND CASSON LTD V MACKENZIE ENGINEERING LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNORTHERN DEVELOPMENTS (CUMBRIA) LTD V J & J NICHOL | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69745 _d69745 |
||