000			01186cam a2200253 4500
001			WB3810-19
008			020312n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117108
245			_aNot absolutely evident
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0210) 9 March 2003, 154(1)
520			_aThe third in a series of four articles on statutory notices discusses the issue of 'evident error' and emphasises the importance of statutory requirements. Examines the recent case "Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd " where the Court of Appeal had to consider whether a landlord's counternotice under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s45 had been valid. For the case see Abs63736.
590			_aWB
650			_aEVIDENT ERROR
650			_aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aLEASES
650			_aBURWELL V MOUNT COOK LAND LTD
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S45
650			_aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
650			_aSPEEDWELL ESTATES LTD AND ANOTHER V DALZIEL AND OTHERS
650			_aCOUNTERNOTICES
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT
942			_n0
999			_c69766 _d69766