000			01824cam a2200253 4500
001			WB3810-22
008			020313n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117124
245			_aR v East Sussex CC ex p Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd and another
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 10 EG 158 (CS) (09/03/02)
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2003] 1 WLR 348-359(12)
490			_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2003] 1 P&CR 5
520			_a[2002] UKHL 8 28 February 2002. Respondent (R) operated a waste-processing plant on site that it had bought from ESEL, a company set up by the appellant council (E) to fulfill their waste disposal functions. ESEL applied to E under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s73 for aregrant of existing permission to allow 24-hour electricity generation. This was allowed. Later when R wished to commence electricity generation E insisted that a fresh permission was required. R's application that no further permission was required was accepted by HC and by majority in CA.. E's appeal to HL was allowed on grounds that a conditional resolution to grant permission not binding the planning authority could in no way constitute a binding determination under s64 of the 1990 Act. Full copy of judgement available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020228/esusse-1.htm.
590			_aWB
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING
650			_aCHANGE OF USE
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S73
650			_aELECTRICITY GENERATION
650			_aR V EAST SUSSEX CC EX P RETROTECH (PEBSHAM0 LTD AND ANOTHER
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020228/esusse-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c69778 _d69778