| 000 | 00925cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3810-01 | ||
| 008 | 020314n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117132 | ||
| 245 | _aRuling defends attribution conventions | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aAntiques Trade Gazette _v(1530) 16 March 2002, 1-2(1) |
||
| 520 | _aA High Court ruling has defended the conventions of attribution for paintings in a case between a disgruntled customer and Mayfair art dealers Agnew's. While the judge agreed that the painting sold to Mr Drake was not by Van Dyck, he dismissed Mr Drake's claim for a £1.5m refund because Agnew's had only expressed an opinion that it was, and Mr Drake had instead been misled by art agent Steven Callam. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aCONVENTIONS OF ATTRIBUTION | ||
| 650 | _aAGNEWS | ||
| 650 | _aPAINTINGS | ||
| 650 | _aART DEALER | ||
| 690 |
_aArts and antiques _96217 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69786 _d69786 |
||