000			01286cam a2200205 4500
001			WB3811-28
008			020320n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117179
245			_aTown and country planning
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2002] 11 EG 154 (CS)
520			_a"Harrods v SoS Environment, Transport and the Regions and another", CA 7 March 2002. Appellant (H) applied for a lawful use certificate for helicopter landings on its department store roof. The council refused permission claiming the proposed use was not ordinarily incidental to the primary use within Class A1 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987. The SoS applied a test of whether the proposed use was 'ordinarily' incidental to the primary use, found it was not and dismissed H's appeal. H brought proceedings contending the validity of the test. The claim was dismissed and H appealed. Appeal dimissed on the grounds that the SoS had applied the correct test.
590			_aWB
650			_aMATERIAL CHANGE OF USE
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
650			_aHARRODS V SOS ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS
650			_aLAWFUL USE CERTIFICATES
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c69815 _d69815