000			01324cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS54525
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u10963
041			_aeng
245			_aSmith and Smith v Kent CC
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1996) 36 RVR 35-41(7)
520			_aLT 10 February 1995. K proposed a road improvement scheme that would reduce the boundary of S`s front garden, as well as temporarily requiring a further 3m of working space. S served a blight notice on K after reasonable endeavors to sell the house failed. K served a counter notice, claiming it proposed to buy only part of the hereditament. S referred K`s notice to the LT for determination as to whether it was well founded under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s166. "Held" counter notice not well founded and blight notice upheld; part of the garden could not be taken without seriously affecting amenity of the house.
650			_aBLIGHT NOTICES
650			_aCOUNTER NOTICE
650			_aPLANNING DECISIONS
650			_aSMITH AND SMITH V KENT CC
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S166
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6984 _d6984