000			01001cam a2200205 4500
001			WB3812-13
008			020403n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117314
245			_aOccupier's liability
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2002] 12EG 136 (CS)
520			_aTomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and another, CA 14 March 2002. Appellant (T) suffered serious injuries after diving into a mere managed by the repondent council (C). Judge dismissed T's claims as he stated that C had not been under a duty of care because there was no obligation to warn of what was an obvious risk. C appealed and this was accepted, as the earlier judge had not attached sufficient weight to the history of injuries and near fatalities at the mere.
590			_aWB
650			_aTOMLINSON V CONGLETON BC
650			_aOCCUPIERS' LIABILITY
650			_aSAFETY
650			_aOCCUPIERS LIABILITY ACT 1984
690			_aHealth and safety _96244
942			_n0
999			_c69890 _d69890