| 000 | 01415cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65270 | ||
| 008 | 020404n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117351 | ||
| 245 | _aPlummer v Tibsco and another | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2002] 12 EG 137-144(8) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 31 January 2002.The respondent tenant (P) became the licensee of a public house in 1986 and took a five-year tenancy, which included an option to renew for a further five years from October 1991. In 1991 P gave notice to exercise that option. The defendants (T) declined to grant a five-year lease but offered instead a 20-year term under a standard form full repairing lease. In 1992 P was persuaded to take the 20-year lease. The agreement included a clause to surrender the five-year renewable lease. In 1996, P issued these proceedings claiming, inter alia, breach of contract, misrepresentation, and negligent misstatement. The trial judge upheld P's claim and awarded damages. The landlords appealed. "Held", the appeal was allowed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPLUMMER V TIBSCO LTD AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aMISREPRESENTATION | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC HOUSES | ||
| 650 | _aTERMS OF LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aTENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aRENEWABLE LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aSURRENDER AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPRECONDITIONS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c69915 _d69915 |
||