000			01410cam a2200241 4500
001			WB3813-21
008			020411n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117440
245			_aVehicular way over common land
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2002] 14 EG 124 (CS) (6/4/02)
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2003] JPL 75-82(9)
520			_a"Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and others" ([2002] EWHC 472 (Ch), 21 March 2002). The claimant company (X) executed a deed acquired in 1986 that prohibited any person from drawing or driving any vehicle on their common in line with the Law of Property Act 1925 s193. The defendant householders (Y) who had enjoyed full access for over 20 years rejected X's assertion that they would now need X'sauthorisation on the grounds that they all had an easement of way acquired under the Prescription Act 1837 and/or the doctrine of lost modern grant. Judgement for the claimant on basis that neither form of prescription could be be based upon activity contrary to the criminal law.
590			_aWB
650			_aVEHICLE ACCESS
650			_aCOMMON LAND
650			_aLOST MODERN GRANT
650			_aPRESCRIPTION ACT 1837
650			_aBAKEWELL MANAGEMENT LTD V BRANDWOOD AND OTHERS
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S193
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c69965 _d69965