000			01257cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS65367
008			020417n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117546
100			_aMurphy, S
245			_aJudgment of errors
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0212) 23 March 2002, 130(1)
520			_aExplores the issue of challenging the determination of an expert witness. Provides guidance on challenging an expert as set out in "Toepfer v Continental Grain Co" (1974) and illustrates how "Invensys plc v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd" (2002) gave the courts a rare opportunity to examine these principles. In "Invensys" the court had to consider what material was examinable in deciding whether a manifest error had arisen and whether a manifest error had actually occurred. Concludes that a court will rarely interfere with an expert's decision, unless there is an obvious manifest error.
590			_aABS
650			_aEXPERT WITNESSES
650			_aTOEPFER V CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO
650			_aNVENSYS PLC V AUTOMOTIVE SEALING SYSTEMS LTD
650			_aEXPERT DETERMINATION
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES
942			_n0
999			_c70002 _d70002