000			01336cam a2200253 4500
001			WB3814-20
008			020418n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117556
245			_aLandlord and tenant
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 15 EG 133 (CS) (13/4/02)
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 47 EG 150-157(8)
490			_aCourt of Appeal (Civil Division) _v[2002] EWCA Civ 403
520			_a"Southwark LBC v Long", CA 27 March 2002. Respondent (L) was a secure tenant of a flat in a block in south-east London where clause 18(4) of the tenancy agreement required the appellant local authority (S) to keep the estate tidy. The flat was situated next to a rubbish chute that was causing a noise nuisance. L brought action against S for breach of the tenancy agreement and the judge found S had breached their duty under the tenancy agreement. S appealed contending that reasonable steps had been taken in compliance with clause 18(4) to alleviate the problem. Appeal dismissed.
590			_aWB
650			_aSOUTHWARK LBC V LONG
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252
650			_aLANDLORDS CONVENANTS
650			_aTENANCY AGREEMENT
650			_aCONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE
650			_aRUBBLSH SHUTE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c70003 _d70003