000			01321cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS65424
008			020418n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117563
100			_aBerry, J
245			_aMisguided notions
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0214) 6 April 2002, 120-121(2)
520			_aArgues that responses to the planning green paper have ignored several important proposals that should have received more publicity. One major area of concern is the lack of adequate resources. Argues that if this was addressed, there would be immediate improvements in all areas of the planning system. Discusses the viability of a number of proposals including the certificate to replace outline permission, the three year implementation period, the abolition of twin-tracking, delivery contracts, unified applications and the three month appeal period. Concludes that while the planning green paper contains some positive ideas, many of the reforms could cause confusion and delay.
590			_aABS
650			_aPLANNING REFORM
650			_aPLANNING SYSTEM
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aPLANNING APPLICATIONS
650			_aRESOURCES
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c70008 _d70008