| 000 | 01169cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65297 | ||
| 008 | 020424n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117651 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T | ||
| 245 | _aIndecent proposals | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v267(8229) 12 April 2002, 48-49(2) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at claims by unsuccessful parties to an adjudication to set-off the amount to be paid under the decision by sums owed to it by the successful party. Reviews "Robert McAlpine v Pring St Hill" (2001) where the contractor brought enforcement proceedings and in which the defendant subcontractor made a set-off claim. Highlights the subcontractor's argument on the requirements of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aROBERT MCALPLINE V PRING ST HILL | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aSET-OFF CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70053 _d70053 |
||