| 000 | 01124cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3816-18 | ||
| 008 | 020429n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117729 | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA case of warts and all | |
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0217) 27 April 2002, 153(1) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the deficient provisions within the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 governing the termination of a fixed-term business tenancy by a tenant. While some of the issues were resolved by "Esselte AB v Pearl Assurance Ltd"[1997], the recent case "Single Horse Properties Ltd v Surrey County Council"[2002] has extended the benefits of "Esselte" at the expense of landlords; a tenant can terminate a business tenancy by quitting before the contractual term date, even when there is an ongoing application for a new tenancy. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 | ||
| 650 | _aESSELTE AB V PEARL ASSURANCE | ||
| 650 | _aSINGLE HORSE PROPERTIES V SURREY CC | ||
| 650 | _aTERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aFIXED TERM TENANCIES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70105 _d70105 |
||