| 000 | 01093cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3816-22 | ||
| 008 | 020430n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117778 | ||
| 245 | _aLimitation period clarification | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aRICS News Service _v26 April 2002, |
||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 19 EG 146 (CS) |
||
| 490 |
_aArchitects' Journal _v17(215) 2 May 2002, 10(3) |
||
| 520 | _a"Cave v Robinson" has now been successfully appealed to the House of Lords overturning the Court of Appeal's decision. This has restored the limitation periods that existed prior to the "Brocklesby"case. This means that for a claimant to bring a claim ♯out of timeα there must be a deliberate concealment on the part of the defendant. http://www.rics.org/ricscms/bin/show?class=News&template=/includes/shownews.html&id=2371 | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aCAVE V ROBINSON JARVIS AND ROLF | ||
| 650 | _aBROCKLESBY V ARMITAGE & GUEST | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE CLAIMS | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70129 _d70129 |
||