| 000 | 00984cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65441 | ||
| 008 | 020501n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117796 | ||
| 100 | _aEyden, R | ||
| 245 | _aWhen is it reasonable to be unreasonable? | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aCSM _bChartered Surveyor Monthly _vApril 2002, 27(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIllustrates extent to which a court would be prepared to imply obligations into a development contract, in particular a general obligation for a party to act reasonably. Cites recent case "Liverpool City Council v Walton Group Plc" where the court decided it was not open to claimant to refuse to allow development to proceed on grounds that it now favoured an alternative scheme with a different developer. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL V WALTON GROUP PLC | ||
| 650 | _aREDEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aOBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPERS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70146 _d70146 |
||