000			01469cam a2200205 4500
001			ABS65360
008			020507n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117834
100			_aBrewer, G
245			_aGeoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting considers the adjudication ambush
260			_c2002
490			_aContract Journal _v413(6371) 4 April 2002, 22(1)
520			_aReviews "Edmund Nuttall v R G Carter Limited", which considered the extent to which new facts and matters may be relied on in an adjudication. Case dealt with matter of presentation of new claims in a notice served ten days before Christmas, material which had not been seen before by defendant (C). Case was still decided and lost. C refused to pay,and case proceeded to enforcement. Adjudication judged decision had been without jurisdiction and was unenforceable. Concludes that while a party can refine arguments for the purpose of adjudication, if it intends to rely on new facts and matters, the other party must be given sufficient opportunity to respond before commencement of adjudication.
590			_aABS
650			_aEDMUND NUTTALL V R G CARTER
650			_aFASTRACK CONTRACTORS V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c70162 _d70162