| 000 | 01103cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65363 | ||
| 008 | 020507n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117847 | ||
| 100 | _aElliott, T | ||
| 245 | _aStuck to your guns? | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v267(8229) 12 April 2002, 50(1) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at recent decision in "R G Carter v Edmund Nuttall" where introduction of radical new arguments resulted in substantial award against claimant, which he appealed. Concludes that barring new arguments and evidence would be extreme, but it can produce situations where adjudicator may make decision he has no jurisdiction over. Expects Court of Appeal to provide guidance of degree of new arguments allowable. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRG CARTER V EDMUND NUTTALL | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSIONS OF TIME | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70174 _d70174 |
||