000			01314cam a2200205 4500
001			ABS65411
008			020508n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u117883
245			_aGilje and others v Charlgrove Securities Ltd
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 16 EG 182-185(4)
520			_aCA 4 October 2001. Appellant landlord (C) owned headlease of building containing four flats let to respondent tenants (G). Included covenant by C to provide resident housekeeper, and C sought to recover notional rent for flat in service charge. Then C increased caretakers wage, but deducted sum equal to increase, as rent for flat, and sought to recover from G full amount of caretakers increased wages. G challenged liability to pay various items in service charge in application to leasehold valuation tribunal. Which decided that amount charged and increased wages were reasonable. G challenged the LVT and LT's decisions in the CC who found in favour of G. The CA dismissed C's appeals. CC decisions upheld.
590			_aABS
650			_aGILJE AND OTHERS V CHARLEGROVE SECURITIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650			_aNOTIONAL RENT
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985
650			_aAGAVIL INVESTMENT CO V CORNER
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c70206 _d70206