| 000 | 01009cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3818-20 | ||
| 008 | 020516n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u117980 | ||
| 245 | _aBusiness lease renewal | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 19 EG (CS) 11/5/02 |
||
| 520 | _a"J Murphy & Sons Ltd v Railtrack plc" CA, 29 April 2002. When assessing the open market rent for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II on premises which were landlocked and only accessible through land owned tenant (J), the HC held that only 60% of the rent should be charged. The appellant landlord's (R) appeal that the lack of access should be disregarded was dismissed. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aJ MURPHY AND SONS LTD V RAILTRACK PLC | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aLEASE RENEWAL | ||
| 650 | _aOPEN MARKET RENT | ||
| 650 | _aOPEN MARKET VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTED ACCESS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70265 _d70265 |
||