000			01471cam a2200217 4500
001			WB3819-21
008			020522n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118085
245			_aLandlord and tenant: service of notice
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 20 EG 223 (CS) (18/5/02)
520			_a"Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd", CA 20 April 2002. Appeal by tenant (B) against the decision that a notice to quit had been validly served by the respondent landlord (F) following bomb damage to the premises. B did not receive the notice to quit and contended that the service at the demised premises was invalid, the postal service under clause 6.9 of the lease in accordance with the Law of Property Act 1925 s196 was invalid, and the same applied to postal service pursuant to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927. Appeal dismissed on the grounds that the provision for postal service in clause 6.9 and pursuant to the 1927 Act did not imply an exception for returned letters and service at the demised premises had been valid. Full copy of judgement available on http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1155&searchTerm=Blunden&ascending=false&index=0&maxIndex=0
590			_aWB
650			_aBLUNDEN V FROGMORE INVESTMENTS
650			_aNOTICE TO QUIT
650			_aDEMISED PREMISES
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c70324 _d70324