| 000 | 01064cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65543 | ||
| 008 | 020522n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u118103 | ||
| 100 | _aButler, J. | ||
| 245 | _aUnder guarantee | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0219) 11 May 2002, 142(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn the first of two articles, the authors consider the effectiveness of common provisions found in lease guarantees.The main points that emerge are that a lease variation may discharge the guarantor and that the former guarantor's liability may be limited by the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 s18. The next article will focus on guarantee provisions dealing with a tenant's insolvency. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASE VARIATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aHOLME V BRUNSKILL | ||
| 650 | _aWEST HORDON INDUSTRIAL PARK LTD V PHOENIX TIMBER GROUP PLC | ||
| 650 | _aGUARANTEE PROVISIONS | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) ACT 1995 S18 | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 700 | _aWilliams, H. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70336 _d70336 |
||