000			01381cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS65492
008			020524n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118132
245			_aTakhar and Takhar v Wolverhampton MBC
260			_c2002
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v[2002] RVR 96-124(28)
520			_aLT 18 January 1999. Claimants (T) sought compensation for the compulsory purchase of a four storey terrace building comprising five houses with a redevelopment site at rear which was in a conservation area. Valuation date was 11 December 1995. T made two valuations of the building:(a) refurbishment basis assuming available grants (b) demolition basis. Council (W) valued site at rear only and claimed no refurbishment grants would be available and demolition consent would not have been given. The building was duly refurbished after compulsory purchase mainly from W's funds. "Held" that the compensation payable by W to T should be £97 500.
590			_aABS
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961 s15(3)
650			_aPOINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
650			_aREFURBISHMENT BASIS
650			_aDEMOLITION BASIS
650			_aTAKHAR AND TAKHAR V WOLVERHAMPTON MBC
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
999			_c70349 _d70349