000			01353cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS65497
008			020527n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118146
100			_aHelps, D
245			_aHands off our law
260			_c2002
490			_aBuilding _v167(8233) 10 May 2002 49(1)
520			_aDiscusses the recent trend for judges to disparage the use of arbitration in the settlement of disputes, even overturning arbitrators' decisions on appeal. Argues that it is up to parliament and the construction industry to decide how adjudication can and should be used in practice, not the judiciary. Refers to cases such as RG Carter v Edmund Nuttall where the judge produced a definition of dispute that is causing considerable problems for both adjudicators and parties.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
650			_aRG CARTER V EDMUND NUTTALL
650			_aBALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION V LAMBETH B C
650			_aMACOB CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION LTD
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c70356 _d70356