000			01594cam a2200205 4500
001			ABS65500
008			020312n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118290
245			_aShimizu Europe Ltd v Automajor Ltd
260			_c2002
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2002] 3 BLR 113-124(12)
520			_aTCC 17 January 2002. The claimant (S) brought CPR Part 8 proceedings seeking enforcement of an adjudicator's award, which the defendant (A) challenged on the grounds that the adjudicator had ordered payment in areas where he had no jurisdiction. "Held": judgement was given in favour of the claimant on the grounds that the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide if A should make a payment to S and how much that payment should be. The judge also stated that it was not open to a party to an adjudication to approbate and reprobate an adjudicator's decision and that A could not but use the reasoning behind a decision that they had refused to accept as a whole to make a part payment. Full judgement available on the Court Service website http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=266&searchTerm=shimizu&ascending=false&index=0&maxIndex=1
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES PART 8
650			_aSHIMIZU EUROPE LTD V AUTOMAJOR LTD
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=266&searchTerm=shimizu&ascending=false&index=0&maxIndex=1
942			_n0
999			_c70421 _d70421