000			01253cam a2200193 4500
001			ABS65503
008			020507n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118294
245			_aEdmund Nuttall Ltd v R G Carter Ltd
260			_c2002
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[2002] CILL 1853-1857(5)
520			_aTCC 21 March 2002. C refused to comply with an adjudicator's decision in favour of N in proceedings for an extension of time and loss and expense on the grounds that there were significant differences from the original claim in the factual justification for and quantification of loss and expense in the expert's report accompanying the referral notice and that this was effectively a different claim. The judge ruled in favour of C stating that a party must submit to adjudication the facts and arguments previously rehearsed between the party.
590			_aABS
650			_aEDMUND NUTTALL LTD V R G CARTER LTD
650			_aEXTENSIONS OF TIME
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c70425 _d70425