| 000 | 01220cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65574 | ||
| 008 | 020611n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u118355 | ||
| 100 | _aToner, N | ||
| 245 | _aDuty unbound | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v67(19) 17 May 2002, 50-51(2) |
||
| 520 | _aAsks whether tax exemptions for deprived areas can replace profitable loopholes in stamp duty lost in April's Budget. The tax exemptions are aimed at encouraging urban regeneration in areas suffering from social and economic deprivation by reducing the entry costs imposed on business. The designations for deprived areas are based on a combination of electoral wards and postcodes and this can produce areas, especially in London, where affluent areas can come under the tax exemptions because they share the ward or post code with an area of high unemployment and poor housing. Consequently there may be unintentional benefits but one needs to check carefully that a building falls into the scheme's parameters. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSTAMP DUTY | ||
| 650 | _aTAX EXEMPTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN REGENERATION | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY TRANSACTIONS | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70448 _d70448 |
||