000			01480cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS65635
008			020619n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118449
245			_aFirst Property Growth Partnership LP v Royal & Sun Alliance Property Services Ltd
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2002] 22 EG 140, 140-142(3)
520			_aChD 8 March 2002. The claimant landlord (F) owned the reversion to a lease of commercial premises held by the defendant tenant (R). The lease provided for rent reviews. Clause 4 of the lease provided that the landlord might serve a notice to the tenant not more than twelve months before the relevant review date or within three months of the trigger notice. The rent had last been reviewed with effect from 7 May 1990. F served a notice in April 2001 to have the rent reviewed. R contended that the notice was invalid because it did not satisfy the requirements of Clause 4. F argued that clause 4 imposed no time limit upon the giving of a review date. "Held" the lease supported five-yearly reviews. Time was of the essence of the clause.
590			_aABS
650			_aFIRST PROPERTY GROWTH PARTNERSHIP LP V ROYAL AND SUN ALLIANCE PROPERTY SERVICES LTD
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aTRIGGER NOTICES
650			_aTIME OF THE ESSENCE
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
650			_aRENT REVIEW CLAUSES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c70504 _d70504