000			01171cam a2200205 4500
001			WB3822-17
008			020620n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118469
245			_aRight of entry
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 24 EG 147 (CS) 15/6/02
520			_a"Yeoman's Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick" CA 30 May 2002. Respondent (B) was a statutory tenant of a flat in a block under a tenancy granted by appellant landlord's (Y) predecessor in title. Y initiated extensive refurbishment works and served a notice on B requiring possession of the flat whilst works were being carried out. When B refused to comply, Y brought proceedings for possession on grounds of a breach of the entry covenant. Judge whose decisions was upheld on appeal decided that the important governing word was 'repair' and this did not cover the proposed type of extensive work.
590			_aWB
650			_aYEOMANS ROW MANAGEMENT LTD V BODENTIEN-MEYRICK
650			_aRIGHT OF ENTRY
650			_aREPAIR AND MAINTENANCE
650			_aREFURBISHMENT WORKS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c70524 _d70524