000			01151cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS65648
008			020620n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118476
100			_aEdwards, M.
245			_aWhen a house is not a home
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0221) 25 may 2002, 140(1)
520			_aA recent case "R (on the application of Hossack) v Kettering BC and another" (2002) highlights that the court has held that people living in the same property cannot always be classed as a single household - a sufficient relationship must exist. The law courts ruled in the case that no such relationship existed between the residents which classified them as living in the same house. It was realistic to view the use of the properties together as having the characteristics of a hostel.
590			_aABS
650			_aR(ON THE APPLICATION OF HOSSACK) V KETTERING BC AND ANOTHER
650			_aHOSTELS
650			_aHOUSEHOLDS
650			_aCLASS C3
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
700			_aMartin, J.
942			_n0
999			_c70531 _d70531