| 000 | 01410cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DIABS65598 | ||
| 008 | 020624n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u118500 | ||
| 245 | _aExpert determination: challenging an expert determination | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aArbitration Law Monthly _v2(5) May 2002, 7-11(5) |
||
| 520 | _aExpert determination is often used to resolve valuation disputes. It is usual that an expert determination is capable of challenge in the courts in only two circumstances: the an expert has reached a conclusion that is so unreasonable that no reasonable expert could have reached that conclusion; or the expert has ignored his instructions in a material respect in reaching his decision. Examines these aspects of expert determination in two decisions of Thomas J, "Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SpA" (2001) and "Invensys plc v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd" (2001) and a decision of the CA, "Veba Oil Supply and Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc" (2001) | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT DETERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aGALAXY ENERGY INTERNATIONAL LTD V EUROBUNKER SPA | ||
| 650 | _aINVENSYS PLC V AUTOMOTIVE SEALINGS SYSTEMS | ||
| 650 | _aVEBA OIL SUPPLY AND TRADING GMBH V PETROTRADE INC | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70548 _d70548 |
||