| 000 | 01382cam a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65580 | ||
| 008 | 020625n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u118516 | ||
| 245 | _aCasson v Ostley P J Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Law Journal _v[2002] 18 Const LJ 145-152(8) |
||
| 490 |
_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2003] 3 BLR 147-153(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 29 June 2001. The appellant (C) employed the respondent (O) to carry out works to its farm. The contract was in the form of O's standard terms and conditions. During the course of the renovation works a fire broke out. The judge at first instance had to decide whether O was liable for the fire damage, given the assumed fact that the fire was caused by its negligence. It was held that the contract exempted O from liability for fire caused by its own negligence. C appealed. "Held" that insurance provisions in a contract are not there mainly for defining the obligations of one party to another. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCASSON V OSTLEY P J LTD | ||
| 650 |
_aInsurance _96249 |
||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aEXEMPTION CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aUNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977 | ||
| 650 | _aREASONABLENESS | ||
| 650 | _aSOLE RISK | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aPLUMBING | ||
| 650 | _aFIRE DAMAGE | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70562 _d70562 |
||