000			01896cam a2200325 4500
001			ABS65647
008			020625n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118520
245			_aSouth Bucks DC v Porter and another; Chichester DC v Searle and others; Wrexham CBC v Berry; Hertsmere BC v Harty and others
260			_c2002
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2002] 1 WLR 1359-1383(24)
520			_aFour cases in which the defendant gypsies appealed against injunctions granted to local planning authorities under the Town and Country Planning Act s187B to restrain a breach of planning control. The gypsies were living in mobile homes on land that they occupied in breach of planning control. They argued that the courts granting the injunctions failed to consider, as well as relevant planning considerations, the probably effect of the order on their human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 s6(1) and the Convention. "Held" the first three appeals were allowed but the fourth was dismissed. Full copy of judgement available on Court Service website http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=124&searchTerm=South+Buckinghamshire&ascending=false&index=18&maxIndex=53.
590			_aABS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS
650			_aGYPSIES
650			_aMOBILE HOMES
650			_aPLANNING CONTROL
650			_aINJUNCTIONS
650			_aSOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DC V PORTER AND ANOTHER
650			_aCHICHESTER DC V SEARLE AND OTHERS
650			_aWREXHAM CBC V BERYY
650			_aHERTSMERE BC V HARTY AND OTHERS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S6(1)
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S187(B)
650			_aINJUNCTIVE RELIEF
650			_aBREACH
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=124&searchTerm=South+Buckinghamshire&ascending=false&index=18&maxIndex=53
942			_n0
999			_c70566 _d70566