| 000 | 01094cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65602 | ||
| 008 | 020710n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u118775 | ||
| 245 | _aFairness and force | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v 28 June 2002 |
||
| 520 | _aJudge Anthony Thornton dismisses the view put forward in earlier article that there was a judicial backlash against adjudication. Outlines the role of the courts in adjudication since this is often misunderstood. Points out that the law gives a party a statutory entitlement to refer any dispute under the contract to an adjudicator. Concludes that adjudication is often not used merely to give a temporary decision but to provide the entire and final answer to a dispute. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aCOURTS | ||
| 650 | _aSCRUTINY | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70712 _d70712 |
||