000			01947cam a2200361 4500
001			ABS65760
008			020722n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118952
100			_aCorner, T
245			_aApplying Alconbury: Article 6, third parties and development plans
260			_c2002
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vJune 2002, 661-673(13)
520			_aConsiders the extent to which arguments based on the European Convention on Human Rights Art 6(1) are likely to be relevant in the context of third party rights and the development plan process. Provides a brief analysis of "Alconbury" in order to examine the wider principles that may be derived from the HL decision. Discusses a number of post-Alconbury cases relating to third party rights and development plans in which "Alconbury" has been interpreted and applied. Concludes with views on the likely future of Art 6 in the area of planning law. Case law. [Taken partly from journal headnote].
590			_aABS
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650			_aTHIRD PARTY RIGHTS
650			_aLOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
650			_aBRYAN V UK
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS EX P ALCONBURY DEVELOPMENTS
650			_aR V HAMPSHIRE CC V VETTERLAIN
650			_aR V RHONDDA CYNON TAFF BC EX P KATHRO AND OTHERS
650			_aR V IPSWICH BC AND ANOTHER EX P MALSTER
650			_aFRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE OFFICE V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND OTHERS
650			_aBRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC V GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL
650			_aR V SOS TRANSPORT AND ANOTHER EX P CUMMINS
650			_aADLARD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650			_aJ S BLOOR V SWINDON BC
650			_aBOVIS HOMES V NEW FOREST DC
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
700			_aBrown, P.
942			_n0
999			_c70782 _d70782