| 000 | 01186cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65748 | ||
| 008 | 020806n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u119224 | ||
| 100 | _aBrunt, D | ||
| 245 | _aPractical solutions | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v229 20 July 2002, 144 (1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses in the second of two articles the practical issues involved in varying forfeiture clauses. Looks at landlords' attitudes to variation which is in essence benefical to the tenant's mortgagee but not to the landlord. Considers what advice solicitors should be giving. Provides a model variation. Key points are: landlords accepting a variation must notify the tenant's lender of proposed proceedings or be sued for breach; solicitors should advise in full awareness of all factors involved; can solicitors be held negligent if they fail to advise lenders on all pros and cons of variation?. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aFORFEITURE CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aVARIATION | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGEES | ||
| 650 | _aFORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70907 _d70907 |
||