000			01615cam a2200229 4500
001			WB3830-16
008			020815n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119342
245			_aPossession order
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2002] 32 EG 87 (CS)
520			_aCA 31 July 2002. "Dunn and another v Bradford Metropolitan District Council; Marston and another v Leeds City Council". These two joined cases both saw the councils (B) as landlords let the propeties to the tenants (D) under secure tenancies. D applied to the court for possession orders under the Housing Act 1985 and these were granted. D sought to hold B responsible for an alleged failure to keep the properties in repair during the whole of the tenant's occupancy. D relied upon their covenants under the former tenancies and sought to establish if those tenancies had continued throughout their occupancy. D applied to postpone possession dates set out in the possession orders. In the first case the judge decided that there was no power to postpone the date of possession but the judge in the second case reached the opposite conclusion. The two losing parties appealed and the first appeal was dismissed while the second was allowed.
590			_aWB
650			_aPOSSESSION ORDER
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985
650			_aSECURE TENANCY
650			_aREPAIR AND MAINTENANCE
650			_aSUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982
650			_aDEFECTIVE PREMISES ACT 1972
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
999			_c70957 _d70957