| 000 | 01403cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65866 | ||
| 008 | 020815n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u119351 | ||
| 100 | _aHall, J | ||
| 245 | _aPolicy, priorities and a divide | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning (for the Natural and Built Environment) _v(1479) 12 July 2002, 16(1) |
||
| 520 | _a6rgues that government planning policy should recognise different development priorities in the north and south of England. The concept of a north-south divide is not a new one. With regards to planning needs, much of the north is still suffering from industrial decline and economic restructuring and government policy needs to reflect this, rather than offer a blanket solution for the whole country as in its planning green paper. Implementation of government planning guidance, legislation and environmental regulations also varies between the north and the south as a reflection of economic realities. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY | ||
| 650 | _aECONOMIC ISSUES | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT POLICY | ||
| 650 | _aSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aNORTH SOUTH DIVIDE | ||
| 650 | _aREGIONAL VARIATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING REGULATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aIMPLEMENTATION | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c70965 _d70965 |
||