000			01354cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS65788
008			020830n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119509
100			_aBessey, J.
245			_aForesight sagas
260			_c2002
490			_aBuilding _v267(8244) 26 July 2002, 50(1)
520			_aDiscusses the recent decision in the Technology & Construction Court in the case of JT Mackley & Company Limited v Gosport Marina Limited. Here a notice of arbitration was declared invalid because the party serving it had not used a procedure under the contract that required a notice of dispute to be served first on the engineer. Concludes that it is often not always simple to challenge an adjudication decision through arbitration and the need for good decision making by adjudicators in the first instance it is important to avoid the need to arbitrate.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aJ T MACKLEY AND CO LTD V GOSPORT MARINA LTD
650			_aICE CONDITIONS
650			_aNOTICE OF DISPUTE
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c71051 _d71051