000			01715cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS65789
008			000000n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119562
245			_aCo-operative Retail Services Ltd and Others v Taylor Young Partnership and others
260			_c2002
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2002] 6 BLR 272-287(16)
520			_aHL 25 April 2002. The appellants (TYP) sought to overturn earlier rulings that their claim for contribution against the defendants was precluded by the existence of an insurance policy in the joint names of the employer (CRS) and the contractor and by contractual provisions. "Held", appeal dismissed, as under the main contract clause Wimpey was not liable to pay compensation for loss and damage caused before practical completion, as any liability for failure to reinstate after the fire was separate and distinct from the liability for causing the fire. The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1976 s1(1) suggests liability is to be considered when contribution is being sought. The true basis of liability is to be found in determining the contract and not in the rules about circuitry of action as between co-insured. Full copy of judgment available on House of Lords website http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020425/co-op-1.htm
590			_aABS
650			_aCO-OPERATIVE RETAIL SERVICES LTD V TAYLOR YOUNG PARTNERSHIP
650			_aFIRE DAMAGE
650			_aJCT STANDARD FORM
650			_aINSURANCE POLICIES
650			_aCONTRIBUTION CLAIMS
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020425/co-op-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c71085 _d71085