| 000 | 01054cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65807 | ||
| 008 | 020905n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u119568 | ||
| 100 | _aKnowles, R. | ||
| 245 | _aThere is no substitute for proof | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aCivil Engineering Surveyor _v August 2002, 23(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe principle that if a legal right is infringed, resulting in financial loss, the right of recovery depends on an ability to prove that what is being alleged has occurred. This is highly relevant to contractors who submit claims and the 1991 case "Wharf Properties Ltd v Eric Cumine Associates" clarified this issue. The judge detailed the kind of conditions behind the success or failure of global claims. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aGLOBAL CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aWHARF PROPERTIES LTD V ERIC CUMINE ASSOCIATES | ||
| 650 | _aJOHN DOYLE CONSTRUCTION LTD V LAING MANAGEMENT LTD | ||
| 650 | _aBURDEN OF PROOF | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71089 _d71089 |
||