000			01394cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS65895
008			020905n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119576
100			_aMurdoch, S.
245		2	_aA second-class power
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0234) 24 August 2002, 83(1)
520			_aArgues that a case last year involving a service charge, R (on the application of Daejan Properties Ltd) v London Leasehold Valuation Tribunal illustrates that the jurisidction enjoyed by leasehold valuation tribunals is strictly limited. Reviews the decision in Wandsworth LBC v Manuel which centred on the jurisdiction of the tribunals and whether the proceedings at issue should be transferred to a LVT. Key points include that the LVT can only consider the reasonableness of the costs of services and of the standard to which they are provided. Also, the tribunal cannot rule on whether the services fall within the terms of the lease or whether the statutory consultation procedure has been followed.
590			_aABS
650			_aLEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL DECISIONS
650			_aDAEJAN PROPERTIES V LONDON LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
650			_aWANDSWORTH LBC V MANUEL
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
650			_aLEASE CONSTRUCTION
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND VALUATION
942			_n0
999			_c71094 _d71094