| 000 | 01281cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65854 | ||
| 008 | 020909n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u119592 | ||
| 245 | _aYeoman's Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 34 EG 84-86(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 30 May 2002. Appellant landlord (Y) was the owner of a flat let under a statutory tenancy to the respondent tenant (B). The tenancy agreement allowed for Y's entry to carry out repairs to the inside or the outside of the flat. Y used this to attempt to enter the flat and carry out works and recover possession for a temporary period. CC decided this right of entry was restricted to entry to the property for repairs or other works that the tenant was obliged but failed to do. Y appealed but this was dismissed as it was decided that Y was not allowed to enter to carry out improvements. The entry clause had to be consistent here with the covenant for quite enjoyment. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aYEOMANS ROW MANAGEMENT LTD V BODENTIEN-MEYRICK | ||
| 650 | _aCOVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT OF ENTRY | ||
| 650 | _aIMPROVEMENT WORKS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1977 | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71108 _d71108 |
||