000			01266cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS65900
008			020924n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119825
100			_aBrewer, G
245			_aConsiders extensions of time
260			_C2002
490			_aContract Journal _v414(6386) 17 July 2002, 21(1)
520			_aLooks at recent case "Motherwell Bridge Construction v Micafil Vakuumtechnik" [2002] which deals with the concurrent delays arising after the date for completion of the works. Implies that a contractor may be entitled to an extension of time for a relevant delay event, regardless of other delays caused by the contractor. In determining the effect of such delays after the date for completion, it may be correct to take into account the incidence of the delaying event and thus award a full extension of time, if that is considered fair and reasonable. (Taken from article headnote)
590			_aABS
650			_aEXTENSIONS OF TIME
650			_aMOTHERWELL BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LTD V MICAFIL VAKUUMTECHNIK
650			_aBALFOUR BEATTY BUILDING LTD V CHESTERMOUNT PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aHENRY BOOT CONSTRUCTION (UK) V MALMAISON HOTEL (MANCHESTER)
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c71208 _d71208