| 000 | 01197cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65928 | ||
| 008 | 020925n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u119834 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G | ||
| 245 | _aExamines challenges to adjudication by referral to arbitration | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v414(6389) 7 August 2002, 2(1) |
||
| 520 | _aReviews an adjudicator's decision by arbitration, in the recent case of "J T Mackley and Co Ltd v Gosport Marina Ltd" [2002]. The implication is that where parties seek to challenge an adjudicator's decision by referring the matter to arbitration under an ICE form, it will first be necessary to obtain an Engineer's Clause 66 decision in respect of the same matters. (Taken from article headnote) | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aJ T MACKLEY & CO LTD V GOSPORT MARINA LTD | ||
| 650 | _aICE FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71216 _d71216 |
||