000			02188cam a2200313 4500
001			ABS65962
008			021003n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119991
245			_aPumperninks of Piccadilly Ltd v Land Securities plc and others
260			_c2002
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2002] 3 WLR 898-930(33)
490			_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2003] 1 P&CR 205-238(34)
520			_a[2002] EWCA Civ 671, 10 May 2002. Defendant (L) demised to the tenant (P) a 25 year underlease for a shop forming part of a building defined as excluding all structural and loadbearing parts (an eggshell tenancy). L opposed P's application to renew the tenancy on the ground that it intended to demolish the demised premises or a substantial part of them, relying on Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 as amended by the Law of Property Act 1969 s 30(1)(f), 31A(1)(a). P's application was refused because (a) the tenant's part of the building could be demolished with the landlord having to gain possession in order to carry out intended works (b) P was not entitled to rely on s31A(1)(a) of the Act. "Held" (1) "demolish" and "reconstruct" in their ordinary meaning could be applied to the subject matter of an eggshell tenancy for the purpose of s31(1)(f) of the Act. (2) The condition in s31A(1)(a) of the Act was not satisfied and L could not reasonably carry out the works without obtaining possession. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk/.
590			_aABS
650			_aEGGSHELL TENANCIES
650			_aPUMPERNINKS OF PICCADILLY LTD V LAND SECURITIES PLC AND OTHERS
650			_aDEMISED PREMISES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1969 S7(1)
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1969 S30(1)(F)
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1969 S31A(1)(A)
650			_aHEATH V DROWN
650			_aSECURITY OF TENURE
650			_aDECCA NAVIGATOR CO LTD V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL
650			_aREDFERN V REEVES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1168 _vView judgment on the Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c71302 _d71302