000			01753cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS65981
008			021004n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u119997
245			_aHoward v Charlton
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 39 EG 150-155(6)
520			_aCA 25 July 2002. Respondent (C) had an agreement to occupy a plot and a caravan on a caravan site. C erected subsequently with planning permission a porch extension to the caravan. Appellant site owner (H) brought proceedings against C arguing that the caravan and porch extension could not be moved as a single unit and therefore C had lost protection under the Mobile Homes Act 1983. H appealed against county court judgment that held that the caravan had not in fact and degree changed its character as a mobile home and her claim for possession was dismissed. "Held" appeal dismissed. The mere fact that a mobile home had been extended did not of itself provide any ground for terminating the defendant's agreement to occupy. It was not necessary in this case to consider whether the extension took the home outside the statutory definition of a caravan and/or the protection of the Mobile Homes Act 1983. Full copy of judgement available on Court Service website http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1291&searchTerm=Howard&ascending=false&index=1&maxIndex=19.
590			_aABS
650			_aMOBILE HOMES
650			_aMOBILE HOMES ACT 1983 PART 1
650			_aCARAVAN
650			_aPOSSESSION
650			_aPROTECTED SITE
650			_aHOWARD V CHARLTON
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1291&searchTerm=Howard&ascending=false&index=1&maxIndex=19
942			_n0
999			_c71304 _d71304