| 000 | 01820cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65982 | ||
| 008 | 021004n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120001 | ||
| 245 | _aSmith and another v South Gloucestershire DC | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 38 EG 206-210(5) |
||
| 520 | _a[2002] EWCA Civ 1131, 31 July 2002. Claimant (S) purchased a farmhouse property unaware of an agricultural occupancy planning condition affecting an agricultural worker's dwelling on the property. This should have been registered by the defendant council (SG) in the local land charges register and the planning conditon was valid notwithstanding the failure of SG to register it. S, having already spent £ 226 540 on renovations, attempted to get the condition removed. SG was deemed liable to pay compensation to S under the Local Land Charges Act 1970 s10, being £197 500 (discovery date valuation) or £292 500 (hearing date valuation. S appealed against adoption of discovery date valuation. "Held" appeal allowed. The hearing date valuation (£292 500) was in all circumstances the appropriate date of valuation as S had ceased further renovation works and sought removal of the condition as soon as it was discovered. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL LAND CHARGES | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL LAND CHARGES ACT 1975 S10 | ||
| 650 | _aALCOA MINERALS OF JAMAICA V BRODERICK | ||
| 650 | _aSMITH AND ANOTHER V SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE DC | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF DUTY | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION DATE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=1320 _vView judgment on the Court Service website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71307 _d71307 |
||