| 000 | 00931cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3116-100 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u11209 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aValidity offers no criminal defence | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v19 April 1995, 38(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "R v Wicks", CA 10 April 1995, it was held that the decision to issue an enforcement notice could not be challenged on the grounds of irrelevant matters, perversity and bad faith by way of defence to an indictment alleging an offence contrary to Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s179(1). | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPLIANCE PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICE | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S179(1) | ||
| 650 | _aWEDNESBURY CORPORATION V ASSOCIATED PROVINCIAL PICTURES HOUSES LTD | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c7132 _d7132 |
||