| 000 | 00947cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66005 | ||
| 008 | 021022n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120212 | ||
| 100 | _aKlein, R. | ||
| 245 | _aPaying for a breach of contract | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6785) 26 September 2002, 27(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses a recent case that shows non-payment can be considered grounds for a party to treat a contract as ended. However a recent case "Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvian Shipping Co & Others " (2002) shows that the timing of payment must be a condition of the contract. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDR BRADLEY V JEFCO MECHANICAL SERVICES | ||
| 650 | _aSTOCZNIA GDANSKA SA V LATVIAN SHIPPING CO & OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aNON-PAYMENT | ||
| 650 | _aTIMING | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT OF SUSPENSION | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71410 _d71410 |
||